Operation «Independent peninsula»

Post navigation

Operation «Independent peninsula»

Attempt № 2

On January, 20th Crimea celebrates the 20 anniversary of change of the status. According to spent this day in far 1991 to a referendum, the peninsula has recreated Crimean Independent. The Soviet Socialist Republic.

For such decision 93,26 % of inhabitants of edge have voted. Boycott to a referendum declared the Crimean Tatars not concordant with territorial borders of independent formation. However, even if all of them would take part in voting and have spoken against, it wouldn’t change an overall picture, therefore as on sites 81,37 % of Crimeans have come. 20 % Only there are less remained out of the historical decision.

So unanimous position of the population of peninsula hasn’t left any choice of the central power — Supreme body USSR ligalised will results of Crimeans. In structure then still the Soviet Ukraine there was the independent formation which has kept the status and in the history of the independent Ukrainian state.

Here only with this status regularly there are any misunderstanding. Simferopol and Kiev long couldn’t define, how it is necessary to divide powers on peninsula. A separate theme always there was Sevastopol. Oil plus to fire added that Ukrainian right, demanding to equate Crimea to the area status, the Ukrainian left, often not hiding supports of idea of compartment of peninsula from Ukraine and its joining to the Russian Federation. But Crimea has at the very least kept uncertain, but stable the status quo.

And here new head of ARC Regional Vasily Dzharty in anniversary year announced changes. In 2011 has set the task to strengthen powers of the authorities of an autonomy and to strengthen the semiindependent status of peninsula.

«Today all of us do to strengthen an autonomy. Not to separate, and that it as a part of Ukraine was stronger, as well as any region, as well as any territory as a part of the state», — has designated the motives the Crimean prime minister.

Naturally, reaction hasn’t kept itself waiting long. The head of a Medzhlis and deputy from OU-OS Mustafa Dzhemilev, apparently, should welcome idea of isolation of historical edge of dwelling national minority. However he doesn’t hasten to do it, and estimates idea of the Crimean prime minister rather pragmatically.

«Dzharty, likely, meant strengthening of the powers. I know that he has initiatives on change concerning the order allotments. In this plan his power because it is the most delicious object» will amplify, of course, — he has commented on the initiative of Dzharty.

Such economic strengthening won’t cause political consequences, he is assured.

«Now an accurate vertical of the power. All solves Dzharty on command from above. In SR of autonomy on 80 % by hook or by crook their representatives, they make overwhelming majority, and all of them solve. More than 40 % of all high-ranking officials of Autonomous republic are the people who have recently arrived from Donetsk, that is Varangians who have no relation to Crimea, as well as Dzharty», — has explained the scepticism Dzhemilev.

Andrey Shkil the deputy from «BYT — Batkivshina «prefers not to speak about political aspects.

«It is necessary to expand an autonomy in the cultural plan, it is possible to speak about any special economic conditions, but at all political», — he has noticed.

However unlike the colleague on opposition,»awards» aspiration of Dzharty political grounds.

«I consider that it is directed against Ukraine. Consequences can be pitiable because it strikes blow to the sovereignty of Ukraine», — Shkil is rather afraid.

One more sight from the Ukrainian parliament shows the representative of the party of regions Vasily Hara.

«The autonomy and independence begin with economy», — he underlines and expresses bewilderment as АRC can economically prove the claims on expansion of the independent rights.

From this idea the politician doesn’t wait absolutely for anything good.

«I think that in no event it is impossible to do it. There is at us a Constitution where it is written down that we the unitary state, and all subjects of Ukraine should be equal in rights in the constitutional sense. That overindulgence which was at former presidents concerning Crimea in what good hasn’t resulted. In general the autonomy — the phenomenon undestroyable in relation to the Constitution», — considers Hara.

Concern of members of parliament is divided also by the party leader «Brotherhood» Dmitry Korchinsky.

«It will lead to intensity strengthening in Crimea. The autonomy for the sake of corruption increase» is necessary to them, — he argues.

«I think, all is possible to please Russians. For reduction of the price by gas by 5 dollars it is possible to expand and an autonomy», — not that for fun, not that has seriously added Korchinsky.

Much more optimistically domestic political scientists look at idea of expansion of rights АRC. However, on idea.

The director of the Ukrainian branch of Institute of the CIS countries Vladimir Kornilov doesn’t see in the Crimean prime minister Dzharty of the person, capable to realize the sounded plans.

«Certainly, it would be desirable to believe that Crimea sooner or later it becomes valid an autonomy, instead of that formation which has even less than the rights, than usual area in present Ukraine. But while I don’t see, how it someone practically can make level of Dzharty», — he admitted.

The expert marks practical complexity of realization offered in anniversary for an autonomy year of initiatives.

«It should decide Crimean politicians, at first, and secondly, it should dare at nation-wide level, including with amendments in the Constitution, into variety of laws. And this process, of course, is long», — was noticed by Kornilov.

Similar cautions were sounded also by the director of the Center of political marketing Vasily Stojakin.

«I have such impression that Dzharty does not understand, what maintenance he puts in this concept. In to Crimea there will be, perhaps, few ideas which could unite the Crimean society to such degree. It is possible to tell that for an autonomy of Crimea act more than 90 % Cimeans. That is the in itself idea that the Crimean autonomy should be, it should be certain, its function should be defined and, probably, even are expanded. And this understanding is present. And how it to make, in what borders and as all it to arrange — with understanding of it there are certain problems», — the expert has noticed.

It is inclined to regard words of prime minister of ARC as advances with electorate, aspiration to be pleasant to local residents, but not as the plan of action the next year.

«I all the same believe that mister Dzharty in a greater degree tells it for the Crimean voters, than opens any undercover plans of the power. As far as I understand from this that in general becomes in Crimea at the moment it is a question simply of region-administrative reform which actually doesn’t mention autonomy bases», — Stojakin has declared.

The interesting paradox turns out: those who don’t trust in necessity of expansion of the Crimean autonomy, don’t doubt ability of the today’s power to make it, and here those who is convinced of expediency of improvement of status of ARC, don’t see in the same management of potential to make changes. It is characteristic that to the first category politicians, and irrespective of party coloring belong, and the second is personified by political scientists — like and the informed experts, but at the same time not burdened with cargo of responsibility for the state people.

And who is more right — who will prove not other, as Dzharty. Own behavior in 2011 under which end, and can, and earlier, it becomes clear, how much serious and responsible the Crimean prime minister has approached to a question. Or how much successful there was his «joke». Here only in the latter case hardly it is necessary to count on «rubber» sense of humour of Crimeans…

Andrey GENERALOV

www.from-ua.com

 

Похожие материалы

Ретроспектива дня