News agency QHA (the Crimean news agency) has, seemingly, decided to try the possibilities and abilities in a new form. Instead of employment by noble business useful to a society — objectively and unbiassedly to inform citizens that occurs in the world, around and nearby — news agency QHA was engaged in ungrateful business, trying to rehabilitate through rotted through in intrigues and corruption the organisation headed by politically-bankrupt persons if not to tell more frankly and rigidly.

In a yesterday’s news line young, promising correspondent Nijara Nurmambetova but as it has appeared absolutely not guided in modern subtleties of a national policy, has tried to call in the material into question work of analytical group Milli Firka following the results of presidential elections of Ukraine in the second tour.

Probably, she was to be believed that the most part of the Crimean Tatars all the same is in an orbit of influence of present leaders of Milli Medzhlis, alas, figures and the facts convincingly suggest otherwise. Therefore young «talent» has set for herself a problem (or such installation has been given to her?) to compromise fundamental bases, against which analytical group Milli Firka leant, having drawn a conclusion that 55 % of the Crimean Tatars have ignored an appeal of Dzhemilev-Chubarov actively to vote for Yulia Timoshenko.

Already at the very beginning of the material of Nijara Nurmambetova, without having on that any bases, without knowing about the one who carried out the analysis of results of elections, with not peculiar arrogance for its age «a certain» analytical group «Milli Firka» names authors of this work.

Without naming names and surnames, for quite explainable reasons, we can tell that scientific ranks and those regalia who took part in this work, researches having long-term practical this sort of experience, will suffice for many years of study and scientific activity from tens such correspondents as Nijara Nurmambetova and similar to her journalists.

Correspondent QHA writes: «According to Abduraimova, in the« the analysis »they were guided by the data of the Central election committee in 12 Crimean polling districts which borders coincide with borders of places of compact residing of the Crimean Tatars… It those sites, where as Abduraimov confirms,« more than 90 % of inhabitants — the Crimean Tatars ». However, here become ripe an obvious divergence of the data so, for example, in the Ottoman-dzhami or Kamenka the Crimean Tatars do not make 90 % of inhabitants».

It would seem, convincing argument against the conclusions made by our group. Only unlike news agency QHA Milli Firka does not distort the facts and is responsible for the words. And we know that, for example, in Kamenka except the Crimean Tatars live and representatives of other nationalities. For this reason we took the data not on three polling districts created in microdistrict Kamenka Simferopol, and only on two: № 20 and № 22, in which borders more than 90 % of voters — the Crimean Tatars and members of their families. It is known to us not from a ceiling, and under the data received on each street and each house, located on these sites.

Further Nijara Nurmambetova calls into question an aggregate number of the Crimean Tatars having the right to vote and living in Crimea. But we have made a reservation at once that figure in 193000 voters-of Crimean Tatars are given by Reskomnats (by the way, structure as it stands being under a complete control and management of Milli Medzhlis). However, this figure raises the doubts. And that is why. In the summer of last year Milli Firka has spent selective interrogation in a number of settlements of Crimea on purpose to find out real figure of compatriots living in these parts. Having compared the obtained data to official statistics, it has been established that real number of the Crimean Tatars 60 % more than officially sounded figures!?

In the conclusion of the opus the correspondent of news agency QHA does a conclusion for the sake of which, actually carried out the order: «the Similar» analysis »which correctness raises the big doubts,« Milli Firka »simply manipulates figures, trying to influence public consciousness of crimeans and, first of all, Crimean Tatars. It is nothing as the next attempt to earn « points »at the expense of the groundless criticism of opponents that quite keeps within their last political preferences».

Certainly, in the modern world a word role and furthermore public, on public consciousness it is great and it is significant. Only it is even more significant and it is greater than the most convincing word influence on this most public consciousness of the surrounding validity, real practice, affairs and those acts who applies for people representation. The second — is obvious not in favour of our opponents. And we have no need «to make hit in this sense at the expense of the groundless criticism оpponents». For this purpose it is enough to speak to people though also bitter, maybe, unpleasant to someone, but the TRUTH. Then you will be and is heard, both understood, and supported, without looking at any manipulations and attempts to confuse the issue, those in system those or other mass media entered in system.

It would be desirable to believe that news agency QHA management, will draw corresponding conclusions from this a discomfiture in which it is free or the Internet edition, thanks to feasible «reflexions» and «conclusions» of the correspondent has involuntarily walked smack.

Press-service Milli Firka