Nadir Bekirov: Dzhemilev Doesn’t Have the Bases for the Award

Post navigation

Nadir Bekirov: Dzhemilev Doesn’t Have the Bases for the Award

According to the president of Fund of probes and support of the radical people of Crimea, political scientist Nadir Bekirov, the People’s Deputy of Ukraine, the leader of Medzhlis Mustafa Dzhemilev hasn’t brought any essential contribution to world strengthening to Crimea, for what he could become the Nobel prize winner of the world.

«If in Crimea also there were interethnic conflicts they haven’t outgrown in war, in ethnic slaughter it is not so much because of Mustafa Dzhemilev, it is so much that conflicting parties in Crimea in itself showed any moderation. There is no more of his personal contribution to it, than the contribution of any other Crimean Tatar or not the Crimean Tatar who also didn’t want conflicts and tried to stop them», — considers Nadir Bekirov.

The expert, speaking about any successes in returning and arrangement оf the Crimean Tatar people «the further, the less these successes appear thanks to Mustafa Dzhemilev and more and more they appear contrary to Mustafa Dzhemilev»…

«From 2000 to 2011, I don’t see any successes, and in general any serious initiatives from part of Mustafa Dzhemilev which for last 10-11 years would allow to consider his contribution or to maintenance of peace to Crimea, or in arrangement of the Crimean Tatar people, restoration of their rights. More likely, on the contrary, if the Crimean Tatars achieved something, contrary to its conciliatory, unproductive position which is often motivated, in my opinion, not by basic reasons, and reasons of any personal promotion in the Ukrainian system of the power», — the president of Fund of probes and support of the radical people of Crimea has underlined.

In his opinion, Mustafa Dzhemilev can be nominated for any other international award «as the writer, as the memoirist, as simply public figure, but without any binding to a Crimean Tatar problematics».»The Majority of the Crimean Tatars obviously not with Mustafoa Dzhemilev. The majority of successes of the Crimean Tatars — is obvious not because of Mustafa Dzhemilev. Many very serious failures and serious failures of the Crimean Tatars — because of Mustafa Dzhemilev. He was nominated in this case not by the Crimean Tatars whom, it is possible to assume, very badly know that occurs in Crimea and what role in Crimea is played by Mustafa Dzhemilev, at least, for last 11 years.

Even those who has publicly stated the support of his nomination, in the basic refer to his dissident past. But his dissident past has ended in 1986, here then and it was necessary to do it. Since then has passed 25 years. If to consider that Nansen’s Award in 2000, in my opinion, Mustafa Dzhemilev has received quite deservedly, for last 11 years I don’t see anything that could become the serious base for this purpose », — has summed up Nadir Bekirov.

On materials:


Похожие материалы

Ретроспектива дня